Showing posts with label Napoleon. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Napoleon. Show all posts

Monday, October 23, 2023

Review: The Napoleonic Wars: A Global History

The Napoleonic Wars: A Global History The Napoleonic Wars: A Global History by Alexander Mikaberidze
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

A very thorough overview of the effects and repercussions of everything going on during the Napoleonic wars. This was refreshing, in that for once it didn't concentrate solely on Napoleon. Then again quite a bit of it seemed a bit of a stretch and a bit too indirect to merit being included in the book. Then again, I speak from a position of ignorance, since this obviously isn't my wheelhouse. Still, I enjoyed it a lot, albeit in a pretty passive way.

View all my reviews

Tuesday, September 22, 2020

Review: Napoleon: The Man behind the Myth

Napoleon: The Man behind the Myth Napoleon: The Man behind the Myth by Adam Zamoyski
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

This was written the way I believe a biography should be written. The initial focus is on Napoleon's childhood and formative years, rather than later battles per se (although there is plenty of those as well). I like this because it give much more insight into why and how Napoleon became the man he was. I wish more biographies followed this pattern. 

Some of my notes:
Apparently after the reign of terror in Paris they had parties and balls where you could only attend if a relative of course had died at the guillotine, and they would wear red ribbons around their necks. Talk about gallows humor...

Amusing to think Napoleon was really bad at Chess, considering he was so good at real life strategic warfare. 

Napoleon's favorite author was Ossian, and he considered Homer's poems much weaker in comparison. 

View all my reviews

Friday, May 17, 2019

Review: The Lives of Talleyrand

The Lives of Talleyrand The Lives of Talleyrand by Crane Brinton
My rating: 3 of 5 stars

I picked this up at a used bookstore in Georgia. It's a unique book, not least because it was written in 1936, and it's interesting to see how the style of biographies seems to have changed since then. All in all much of this book sounds, to me, very subjective, opinionated (he even writes, at one point "no one wants to read objective biographies") and meandering (it goes on many tangents). Some of this (especially when the author tries to show how people throughout the years have been misinterpreting Talleyrand, as well as the final two chapters) gets sort of tedious.

I also noticed a lack of footnotes or sources, which we seem to care about more these days I guess. To be fair, there is a bibliography, but it would be close to impossible to match the sources to the passages in the book itself.

The bulk of the book itself, however, is quite informative. Talleyrand is a very interesting man and the author did an excellent job of portraying him. You could probably skip the first and last two chapters though.

Interesting point: The author kept equating France's defeat in 1814 to Germany's in 1918, wondering why the terms were so lenient for the former, while so harsh for the latter, including suggesting that it was due to democracy (the leaders at Versailles had to answer to parliamentary and congressional pressure). I found that an interesting take.

Interesting quote: "One-way principles may lead to Heaven or to the scaffold - perhaps to Heaven by means of the scaffold - but not to diplomatic victories" (p.216)


View all my reviews